Is Silver A Bull Run?

Posted by Finance Professional on May 27, 2011 under Stock Market News | Be the First to Comment

After more than two decades, Western markets, executives and analysts are still fascinated by the data revolution. Companies and researchers in the Developed Nations spend massive sums to convert raw data into useful information; and indeed, at The Complete Investor, we participate in this work ourselves, collaborating with some of the top minds in the field. There’s no denying that it’s a useful industry that generates efficiencies and augments planning and communication; but it hasn’t helped us to focus on developing new and better uses of existing resources – the hard stuff that makes up the material world.

In other words, this emphasis on data manipulation distracts us from the true flesh and bone of our economy – the commodities and energy we consume, which grow ever scarcer, and whose acquisition becomes ever more problematic.

Just how important are these resources? At Ben Bernanke’s recent press conference – the first ever by a sitting Fed chairman – he pointed to “temporary factors” leading to higher inflation. He was talking about higher resource prices. He mentioned other factors as well, but the evidence is clear that resource prices are responsible for both our current higher inflation and for the slowdown in growth.

A quick look at first-quarter 2011 is enough to show that any statistic linked to the period’s disappointing performance is also linked to the surge in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for commodities. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) includes several differently weighted components when generating the overall CPI. We feel that commodities are underweighted in this equation. This obscures the fact that, although the overall CPI rose at a relatively gentle 3%, and “overall inflation” was only 1%, the CPI’s commodity component rose at an annualized 12-13%.

And we would argue that, for the typical American, the commodity CPI is the figure that matters. The BLS doesn’t give the commodity CPI enough weight in the overall index – which is why genfx review inflation seems to be so well-behaved right now. But commodity prices, from fuel to food to raw materials, are fixed costs that become an ever-larger percentage of household expenses as household incomes decrease. Since the typical American household isn’t well off, with the bottom 90% of American families making about $31,000 a year, high commodity prices can be truly daunting. Factor in that $31,000 with $100 fill-ups at the gas station and rising grocery prices, and you see the point.

Most of the current economic indicators do not signify a falling economy, but they certainly imply an economy that’s slowing down dramatically. Those economists who point to the recent sell-off in commodities as the foundation for a new upsurge in growth are dreaming, unless the drop was not a correction but a true downtrend. We hope it is, and, admittedly, we were unsuccessful in predicting a silver low…but we believe that this is just a correction, and not a true long-term trend, especially for silver.

There is a subtle but powerful relationship between silver and rare earth elements. Just as rare earths are critical for wind energy, silver is vital for solar.

With that in mind, consider two recent articles in Technology genf20plus Review (a magazine published by MIT, with carefully researched articles aimed at the non-scientist). These articles (“The Rare-Earth Crisis” and “Rare Talents”) point to the scarcity of both REEs (rare earth elements) and of workers with the skills to use them.

Heavy rare earth elements (HREEs) in particular are essential to green technologies (especially hybrid cars and wind turbines), because HREEs are crucial components of the world’s most powerful magnets. Although the industrialized nations have leaped ahead in computing power, our magnet technology has remained at a virtual standstill: rare earth magnets are still the cutting edge in that arena, more than ten years after they were first introduced.

This is deeply significant, because 95% of all rare earths – and much more than 95% of HREEs – are mined in China. (Molycorp, the one REE producer in the U.S., has light REEs for the most part.) This fact alone could give China a near-monopoly on the easiest and cheapest renewable energy source: wind power, which depends on HREE magnets.

Wind power is not an answer for all the world’s energy issues, but it is crucial to any solution. Japan has retreated from nuclear power, taking countries like Germany with it. Opportunities in hydroelectric power have been almost fully utilized. Biofuel possibilities are limited. If China retains a lock on rare earths, it also retains enormous leverage on wind energy.

That means countries like Japan and the U.S. will be desperate for solar. And China will fight for that too. The Chinese know they will need every renewable they can get their hands on. Even with their potential in wind power, their solar ambitions far exceed those of any other country. Given silver’s necessity in solar-power applications, our conviction on silver – whatever its current low – remains extremely strong.

(Another conviction – but more for the parents of smart kids than for investors – is that a career in materials science or engineering, focusing on REEs, will be bright indeed. The “Rare Talents” article points to the shortage of miners, engineers and chemists equipped to work with rare earths.)

In other words, we are still very bullish on commodities, especially silver and REEs; and we’re wary of the volatility elsewhere in the markets. For the near term, we recommend relatively low-risk stocks, if they are not commodity-related. If they are commodity stocks, then make sure to check them out carefully before you invest.

Bloggers that are searching for information about the niche of forex investment, visit the website which is quoted right in this line.

Crude Oil Flushes Last Week’s Gains

Posted by admin on July 5, 2009 under Commodity & Futures News | Be the First to Comment

Oil bounced off its highs last week and started trading in a clear downtrend. Brent crude oil lost more than 3 percent to finish around 66.65 per barrel last week. This was below the 34 day moving average which is a key level for technical analysts. The 34 day moving average is integral in the Fibonacci sequence created by Italian mathematician Leonardo Fibonacci. The sequence deals with the ratio between prices and is used by technicians to identify support and resistance levels. The commodity was hitting new eight months highs of around 73.50 per barrel near the end of June. It has since lost $7 a barrel and is expected to go lower over the next week. However continuing attacks on oil interests in Nigeria could push crude higher despite the technical signals. Either way we are still a far cry from the almost $150 a barrel we were seeing at this time last summer.

The economic data set to be released this week for commodities is on Wednesday the EIA Petroleum Status Report. The report is released weekly and contains data on petroleum inventories in the United States. Released a day later on Thursday is the EIA Natural Gas Report. Essentially the same report but for natural gas, detailing the inventory of natural gas stored underground in the US, also released weekly. Both reports are released by the Energy Information Administration and contain information for the week ending on the previous Friday.

Gold prices also fell from the top end of their recent trading levels. Even though on Friday the precious metal jumped more than two dollars a troy ounce it closed out the week at 932.80, over $9 lower than its high the previous week. Silver prices also followed suit dropping off of late June highs of more than $14, to end the trading week at around $13.40. While gold prices are expected by many to go significantly higher (some analysts say above $1000 per ounce in the near term and over $1200 an ounce by the end of the year), they seem to have paused and are trading in tandem with both falling oil prices and dropping equity prices.

Over the past few weeks oil and precious metals have been trading in concert with stock markets and for next week it is believed stock traders will be focused on earnings to drive any momentum. One company reporting earnings next week that both equity and commodity traders will be watching is Chevron. The consensus estimates on Wall Street for the energy drilling, refining, and generation company are for $1.18 profit per share versus $2.90 per share in the same period a year ago. They report on Thursday, July 9th after the bell. The stock (CVX) has been trading in the $65 to $70 dollar a share range over the past couple months, down from around $100 per share a year ago.